top of page
Supplemental Education Services under NCLB: Emerging Evidence and Policy Issues
Summary
Click the button below and signup to receive the latest news and information from The Great Lakes Center. We value your privacy and do not share email addresses with any other organizations.
Publication Date
May 1, 2017
Research Areas
Assessment & Accountability
Authors
Patricia Burch, Ph.D., University of Wisconsin-Madison
Publication Type
Policy Brief
Press Release
EAST LANSING, Mich., (May 1, 2007) – Supplemental
Education Services, a key component of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) act, has
been adopted and implemented with little evidence to support its effectiveness
according to a new policy brief funded by the Great Lakes Center for Education
Research and Practice.
The policy brief, “Supplemental Education Services under
NCLB: Emerging Evidence and Policy Issues,” is by Patricia Burch, Ph.D of the
University of Wisconsin-Madison.
The brief examines the supplemental education services
(SES) provision of NCLB, which requires school districts to pay the cost of
after-school tutoring services for eligible students attending schools that have
failed to meet mandated Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) benchmarks three years in
a row. Those schools must set aside up to 20 percent of their Title I funds to
pay for third-party tutoring services provided by state-approved providers.
Currently, this field of providers is dominated by private, for-profit
companies.
The report finds that SES programs have low participation
rates and offer limited services for English Language Learners and special
education students. It also finds that states and school districts lack the
capacity to offer significant monitoring or accountability for SES programs—in
stark contrast to the NCLB law’s strict accountability measures applied to the
schools themselves.
The report emphasizes the overwhelming lack of evidence to
support (or refute) the wisdom of the SES policy. The report states, “existing
research offers little information about specific conditions that support
positive outcomes” from supplemental education services provided under the law.
“To make well-informed decisions in the future, policy makers will require
additional empirical evidence.”
The report recommends policy makers redesign NCLB to commission
federally funded studies that assess the effectiveness of SES programs and their
accessibility to at-risk students. It also offers concrete recommendations for
amending NCLB to assist local school districts and state education agencies
in administering SES programs.
The full policy brief is available at http://www.greatlakescenter.org .
The mission of
the Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice is to identify,
develop, support, publish and widely disseminate empirically sound
research on education policy and practices designed to improve the quality
of public education for all students within the Great Lakes Region.
Visit the Great Lakes
Center website at: http://www.greatlakescenter.or g
Contact:
Patricia Burch – (303) 492-8370; pburch@wisc.edu
sign up for emails
Get the latest K-12 education policy research delivered straight to your inbox!
bottom of page
