top of page
State Takeover, School Restructuring, Private Management, and Students Achievement in Philadelphia
Summary
These two reports examine the impact of private and district management on student achievement in Philadelphia. In 2002, Philadelphia restructured 86 of its lowest-achieving schools and shifted the management of some of them to private companies. The RAND-RFA report concludes that private management has had no impact on math or reading achievement, while district management had a positive effect on math achievement but none on ready. The PEPG report reached virtually the opposite conclusion. It found that private management has had a positive effect on math and reading achievement, while district management has had no measurable effect.
Publication Date
May 7, 2007
Research Areas
Charter Schools; Assessment & Accountability
Authors
Derek Briggs, University of Colorado at Boulder
Publication Type
Think Twice
Press Release
EAST LANSING, Mich. – Two recent studies examining
the restructuring of the lowest-achieving public schools in Philadelphia reach
different conclusions about whether private management has improved student
achievement. Because similar restructuring reform is promoted by the federal No
Child Left Behind law, these studies have important national implications. Both
studies have flaws, however, and neither study is yet sufficient to make
definitive claims about the effects of Philadelphia’s school restructuring
reform.
The two reports reviewed are State Takeover, School
Restructuring, Private Management, and Student Achievement in Philadelphia released by the RAND Corporation in partnership with Research for Action (RFA);
and School Reform in Philadelphia: A Comparison of Student Achievement at
Privately-Managed Schools with Student Achievement in Other District Schools published by the Program on Education Policy and Governance (PEPG) at Harvard
University.
The reports were reviewed for the Think Twice think tank
review project by Derek Briggs, a professor at the University of Colorado at
Boulder.
Both reports attempt to assess the impact of a school
reform in Philadelphia. Starting in 2002, the city’s school district
restructured its 86 lowest-achieving elementary and middle schools. The most
prominent approaches shifted school management to either the district or to one
of several private companies. The reports examine the impact of private or
district management on student achievement in math and reading.
The RAND-RFA paper concludes that private management had no
impact on math or reading achievement, while district management had a positive
effect on math achievement but none on reading. The PEPG paper, meanwhile,
reached virtually the opposite conclusion. It found private management has had a
positive effect on the performance of lower-scoring students in math and
reading, while district management had no measurable effect.
In his review, Briggs indicates that the different findings
can largely be explained by the fact that PEPG did not have the same access to
data as did RAND-RFA. He also identifies and describes the methodological
weaknesses in both reports.
Briggs concludes: “These two studies, read together, do
contribute to our understanding of Philadelphia’s experience. Yet, although the
RAND-RFA study sheds more light on that experience than does the PEPG study,
neither study offers a complete picture, and more research is needed before
drawing any definitive conclusions.”
Find the complete review by Derek Briggs as well as links
to the PEPG and RAND-RFA reports on the web at: http://www.greatlakescenter.org .
About Think Twice
The Think Twice project provides the public, policy makers
and the press with timely, academically sound reviews of selected think tank
publications. It is a collaboration of the Education Policy Studies Laboratory
at Arizona State University and the Education and the Public Interest Center at
the University of Colorado at Boulder and is funded by the Great Lakes Center
for Education Research and Practice.
Kevin Welner, the project co-director and editor, explains
that the project is needed because “despite their garnering of media attention
and their influence with many policy makers, reports released by private think
tanks can be of very poor quality. We don’t consider our reviews to be the final
word, nor is our goal to stop think tanks’ contributions to a public dialogue.
That dialogue is, in fact, what we value the most. The best ideas come about
through rigorous critique and debate.”
The mission of
the Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice is to identify,
develop, support, publish and widely disseminate empirically sound
research on education policy and practices designed to improve the quality
of public education for all students within the Great Lakes Region.
Visit the Great Lakes
Center website at: http://www.greatlakescenter.or g
Contact:
Derek Briggs (303) 492-6320
(email) Derek.Briggs@Colorado.EDU
sign up for emails
Get the latest K-12 education policy research delivered straight to your inbox!
bottom of page
