top of page
Research-Based Options for Education Policymaking - Reading Qualitative Educational Policy Research
Summary
According to William J. Mathis, managing director of the National Education Policy Center, both quantitative and qualitative research methods have the ability to inform policymaking. In particular, qualitative research can fill in gaps in our understanding that quantitative methods cannot capture. Mathis says, “Regardless of the research method used, readers should insist on high-quality work.” This short, concise policy brief provides questions that readers can look for of quality qualitative research.
Publication Date
May 4, 2016
Research Areas
Governance & Public Education
Authors
William J. Mathis, University of Colorado Boulder
Publication Type
Policy Brief
Press Release
Key Elements of Reading Qualitative Education Policy Research
What questions should readers be asking?
EAST LANSING, Mich. (May 4, 2016) – Research-Based Options for Education Policymaking is a multipart brief that takes up a number of important policy issues and identifies policies supported by research. The fifth section, released in two parts, seeks to provide guidance regarding the reading and usefulness of education policy research.
Last week, Holly Yettick identified tips for recognizing higher-quality research studies and making better use of education policy research. Yettick's Five Simple Steps to Reading Policy Research focused on quantitative research methods. In Reading Qualitative Educational Policy Research , William J. Mathis, managing director of the National Education Policy Center, explores key elements of evaluating a qualitative study.
According to Mathis, both quantitative and qualitative research methods have the ability to inform policymaking. In particular, qualitative research can fill in gaps in our understanding that quantitative methods cannot capture.
As such, Mathis says, "Regardless of the research method used, readers should insist on high-quality work."
Mathis suggests readers ask the following key questions of qualitative research studies:
Was the study conducted with rigor?
Are the data sources appropriate for its conclusions?
Was the study placed in a larger body of research?
Did the study display signs of quality, such as: independent peer-review, source integrity, and absence of obvious bias? and
Are the methods clearly explained?
These key elements can help readers identify signs of quality and usefulness with a qualitative study.
Find the concise brief on the GLC website:
http://www.greatlakescenter.org
This concise brief, fifth in a series, is published by the National Education Policy Center, housed at the University of Colorado Boulder, and is made possible in part by funding from the Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice.
This brief is also found on the NEPC website at:
http://nepc.colorado.edu/
Friend on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
The mission of the Great Lakes Center for Education Research & Practice is to support and disseminate high quality research and reviews of
research for the purpose of informing education policy and to develop research-based resources for use by those who advocate for education reform.
Visit the Great Lakes Center website at http://www.greatlakescenter.org/
Contact:
William J. Mathis, (802) 383-0058, wmathis@sover.net
Daniel Quinn, (517) 203-2940, dquinn@greatlakescenter.org
sign up for emails
Get the latest K-12 education policy research delivered straight to your inbox!
bottom of page
